Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.’s potential plan to raise $20 billion in Hong Kong is huge.

That’s not just because $20 billion is a lot of money. After going public in New York, the Chinese e-commerce giant is considering a secondary listing in Hong Kong, Bloomberg News reported on Monday – a coup for the city that’s still sore from missing out on the biggest IPO in history.

It’s also a major boost to Beijing amid the trade spat. Having its pride and joy trade on a foreign bourse isn’t a good look these days.

Investors will rightly start asking why China’s most-valuable company would want to do this. After all, it has plenty of money.

Politics may be the most obvious consideration. By coming closer to home, Alibaba shows Beijing where its loyalties lie; and authorities can revel in what they see as an example of China’s growing power. You can just imagine the state-media editorials crowing about this evidence of the U.S.’s decline.

Big Deal

Alibaba’s 2014 IPO raising $25 billion was the world’s largest ever float. A $20 billion Hong Kong IPO would be the city’s second largest-ever after AIA’s.

Beijing isn’t the only consideration. Trading in Hong Kong would provide a buffer if its New York-listed shares fell victim to global anxiety about U.S.-China tensions. Hong Kong investors – and by virtue of Stock Connect, those on the mainland – are likely to remain more positive toward Alibaba, whose products they use every day. That could put a floor under the company’s American depositary receipts: Given the Hong Kong dollar’s peg with the greenback, any major deviation in share price would present arbitrage opportunities that hedge funds and day traders will quickly shut down.

All this begs the question why Alibaba wouldn’t list directly on the mainland, given China is setting up a technology board aimed squarely at attracting tech stars. Quite simply, the A-share market wouldn’t be able to digest it. An IPO this size would be almost double the largest-ever domestic listing: the $10 billion Shanghai leg of Agricultural Bank of China Ltd.’s 2010 listing.

You Can’t Bank on It

And it’s more than just hanging out a shingle. While this IPO wouldn’t match the scale of shares trading in New York, a Hong Kong IPO would mean the amount of Alibaba ownership circulating in the city would be significant. 1

Even on the corporate-finance front, there’s a lot Alibaba could do with an extra $20 billion. At $28 billion, it currently has the sixth-largest holdings of cash and equivalents in the world, if you exclude financial companies. That figure is a little misleading, though. If you account for current liabilities, then factor back in its free cash flow, Alibaba isn’t quite as rich as it seems:

Cash. Rich

A $20 billion raising would leapfrog Alibaba to the top of global cash holdings.

Cash Machine

A $20 billion raising for Alibaba would give it more cash than it’s likely to generate in a year of operations

Source: Bloomberg

Note: Past FCF is no guarantee of future FCF.

This is more cash than Alibaba is likely to self-generate in a year – even though it appears to be sitting on a lot of money – and would allow it to make some important purchases.

Among the most obvious would be to buy back SoftBank Group Corp.’s stake in Alibaba, which is valued at around $12 billion. This would be a favor to Masayoshi Son, since SoftBank is trading at a massive discount to book value and has a ton of debt to service. Such a deal might include Alibaba becoming a cornerstone investor in Son’s forthcoming Softbank Vision Fund II.

And there are plenty of unicorns to chase, notably in Southeast Asia. Rival Tencent Holdings Ltd. never far away from the hunt. Back home, food-delivery provider Meituan Dianping is giving Alibaba’s ele.me a run for its money – the war for takeout customers is one neither company would willingly surrender.

So with plenty of good reasons for a Hong Kong IPO, it would be almost ridiculous for Alibaba not to do it.

 

Note : This article was originally published on Bloomberg By  and 

Author Shenzhen Blog Network

This article shared in Shenzhen blog with author's permission. It was already published on the author's social media and other platforms.